5.2 - Enhancing public participation in government decision making
This commitment focusses on improving participation and engagement to enhance policy and service delivery outcomes.
It has a broad range of impacts, and specifically advances OGP values of:
Civic participation: by allowing further access to information to ensure meaningful input from interested members of the public into decisions; citizens’ right to have their voices heard; and opening up decision making to more interested members of the public.
Technology and innovation for openness and accountability: by promoting new technologies that offer opportunities for information sharing, public participation and collaboration; and making more information public in ways that enable people to both understand what their governments do and to influence decisions.
A design thinking approach, with three phases (Discover, Create, Deliver) is being applied to implement this commitment. For more information on the methodology, see the commitment’s webpage.
Milestone 1 - Discover phase
The Commitment’s Discover Phase Report was published in December 2017. The Report provides an inspiring and comprehensive business case to improve public participation in the Australian public service (APS). Details on this phase are on our webpage.
The Discover Report is the culmination of 75 interviews with 38 public servants from 13 different agencies; and 42 members of the public from 29 organisations, including business, engagement practitioners, academia, the community sector and peak bodies. It also draws on consultations with experts and a literature review. The project team has presented on the Report to over 400 public servants, to spread awareness of public participation and to brief public servants on its findings.
Stocktake: The Report is also supported by a stocktake of current engagement practices in the APS. The stocktake is a deliverable for this Commitment.
Create phase, Ideate stage
The project team lead Ideation workshops to share the findings from the Discover phase; and draw on these findings to generate, prototype and test ideas that could improve public participation in the APS. Both public servants and civil society were represented at the workshops, with nearly 100 public servants and members of the public attending four workshops. In all, 272 ideas were brainstormed.
Create phase, Prototype stage
The project team synthesised the 272 preliminary ideas into 17 concepts – detailed initiatives and plans to improve public participation in the APS. They were shared with users (public servants and the public), and tested and refined in workshops to ensure they were robust enough to warrant further scrutiny, and improve their chances of implementation. In total, the concepts were tested by 70 APS staff and members of the public in eight workshops. They were also tested on our Department’s online deliberation platform, Dialogue, where they received 88 comments and 131 ratings (see: https://engage.industry.gov.au/getting-the-public-more-involved-in-the-public-service2019s-work).
The result of this testing and refinement is the Prototype Framework (reproduced in the Appendix below).
The Prototype includes a number of components: guiding principles, a standard that establishes a common expectation, an articulation of the ways to engage, initiatives that support meeting this expectation, a capability and resourcing backbone to drive the framework, digital solutions and feedback loops.
The prototype is not perfect, rather it presents a possibility that is to be tested and iterated with APS and civil society members. Indeed, the next steps for us is to further test the components of the prototype framework with public servants and civil society. To this end we held workshops in Canberra and Sydney. The prototype was also on Dialogue, the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science’s online deliberation platform, to raise awareness and for further testing and refinement of the prototype.
The project team is going to publish the raw feedback on the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science’s OGP webpage. This is partly for transparency. It also provides useful stimulus that helps carry on the conversation about how we deliver a practical framework. If anyone is interested in sharing their feedback or ideas, they can email email@example.com.
Current phase – Deliver
The Deliver phase of the project has commenced. The approach being adopted has three distinct stages akin to the agile methodology steps of alpha, beta and live.
We are currently drafting the alpha version by drawing on feedback from the workshops to iterate a revised version of the prototype framework. This version will be shared across government departments to seek formal comments. We will be seeking the endorsement of the Open Government Forum. The Secretaries’ Australian Public Service Reform Committee has agreed to look at endorsing the framework.
In the second stage we will release across the public service a beta version of the framework that consists of the guiding principles, ways of engaging and the standard.
The final stage (live) will see all components of the framework released and working across the whole public service.
Demonstration Engagement - Business Research and Innovation Initiative (BRII)
The design of the framework is informing the BRII challenge to develop a platform that digitally enables community engagement in policy, programme and service design. BRII is a National Innovation and Science Agenda initiative that is designed to ensure that a greater share of government procurement fosters innovation. The implementing team participated in the assessment of the BRII finalists. The challengers who have progressed have attributes that will assist in addressing some of the barriers found in the research. Additionally, the challengers’ proof of concept prototypes will be tested as demonstration projects for this Open Government commitment.
One of the BRII Challengers, Converlens, has successfully tendered to be the engagement platform for the Independent Review of the APS, announced by the Prime Minister on 4 May 2018. This is a major achievement for Converlens, particularly since participation and engagement have been highlighted as important for the Review. While the Review is in its early stages, initial feedback from the team indicates they are happy with Converlens. It would be helpful to hear from civil society about their experience using the platform. Open Government Forum members may have feedback; and otherwise we will ask the Review team if they’ve had any feedback from civil society users.
Government: All Australian Government departments and agencies.
Non-Government: None formally involved, but a reference group has been established comprising experts and practitioners from academia, engagement consultancies and think tanks. The Create phase involves further co-design with the public.
Steps to implementation
|Implementation Step||Implementation Period||Status|
|Jan 2017-Aug 2017||Completed but delayed|
|Sep 2017-Dec 2017||Completed|
Review processes and iterate as necessary.
Status updates for commitments are provided approximately every two months. With each update, agencies are encouraged to provide further and better particulars of the commitment and its steps to implementation, which may result in changes to timelines outlined in Australia’s first Open Government National Action Plan 2016-18.